Physician Assistants Can Declare MMI

Physician Assistants Can Declare MMI

Denver Workers Compensation Workers Compensation Blog

The Statute and case law permits a physician to delegate to a PA the determination of MMI.

Susan Griego injured her wrist at work on June 6, 2016, when a trash dumpster lid closed on her hand. After being provided a list of designated medical providers, the claimant elected to treat at the CCOM clinic. The claimant never saw a physician but was examined and treated by Physician’s Assistant (PA) Byrne. PA Byrne placed her at maximum medical improvement (MMI) on August 8, 2016 with no permanent impairment. The form was co-signed by Dr. Daniel Olson, M.D. The respondents filed a Final Admission of Liability on January 6, 2017 based upon the PA’s report.

Ms. Griego filed an application for a hearing disputing the legitimacy of the Final Admission.  The ALJ upheld the legitimacy of the Final Admission relying on W.C. Rules of Procedure 16-5(A)(6) and 16-7(F)(1), 7 CCR 1101-3, which allow authorized treating physicians to countersign WC 164 forms completed by a PA. The ALJ also referenced § 12-36-106(5) C.R.S. and the decision in Sims v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 797 P.2d 777 (Colo. App. 1990) as authority allowing a physician to delegate to a PA the determination of MMI.

Workers’ Compensation, MMI and other work injury issues can be difficult and confusing to understand. Our Workers’ Compensation Attorneys can help you navigate your Workers’ Compensation Claim. Get a free review of your Denver Workers Compensation case today.

 

Loofburrow & Compensability When Injury Did Not Result In Lost Time Or Impairment

Loofburrow & Compensability When Injury Did Not Result In Lost Time Or Impairment

Denver Workers Compensation

ICAP rejects the argument that an injured worker does not suffer a compensable work injury if the injury does not result in initial lost time or permanent impairment.

Bradley Fincham worked as a truck driver for Home Depot. On April 14, 2014, the Fincham was unloading a “double door” refrigerator from the truck with a co-worker. As he was lowering the refrigerator, both the refrigerator and the dolly pulled, causing Fincham to land on top of the refrigerator.

Four months later Fincham requested medical treatment for his right shoulder and was sent to Concentra. Dr. Bird, diagnosed him with shoulder impingement, provided physical therapy, but did not provide any work restrictions.  She later placed Fincham at maximum medical improvement with no permanent impairment and opined that the claimant did not need any maintenance medical care or permanent work restrictions.

Fincham continued to work full duty without documented pain complaints during the next year-and-a-half until May 5, 2016, when he returned to Dr. Bird complaining of two out of ten right shoulder pain.

Eventually Fincham filed a claim for workers’ compensation.  Home Depot and the carrier denied the claim and the parties proceeded to hearing.  The ALJ determined that Fincham had suffered a compensable work related injury to his right shoulder.

On appeal, the respondents argued that the ALJ erred in “implicitly” concluding that the claimant proved a compensable injury. Relying on the holding in Harman Bergstedt, Inc. v. Loofbourrow, 320 P.3d 327 (Colo. 2014), the respondents argued that the claimant’s injury did not result in sufficient disability to constitute a compensable injury.

The ICAO denied the appeal without prejudice because the ALJ did not award any benefits due to the April 2014 injury.  However the ICAO rejected Respondent’s Loofburrow argument in a footnote, “The Respondents attribute consequences to the word ‘compensable’ which are not intended by the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) or by various judicial uses of the term. As the Loofbourrow opinion explains, the Court in that decision is using the word to refer a claim for which indemnity benefits are payable. However, in different contexts the Act applies the word ‘compensable’ to simply mean an injury that arises out of the and in the course of the employment, even if the injury requires no more than the payment of medical benefits. See  § 8-42-101(6)(a) and (b) or § 8-43-404(9), C.R.S.”

Workers’ Compensation in Colorado can be difficult and confusing. If you need help with a Denver area workers’ compensation case, let our experienced attorneys review your case and help you get the benefits you’re entitled to by law. Get help from our Denver Workers’ Compensation Attorneys, our Greeley Workers’ Compensation Office or Call Us Toll Free at (866) 356-9898 for more information and a free review of your case.

 

 

BRADLEY FINCHAM v. HOME DEPOT, W.C. NO. 5-020-103-01 (11/9/2017)

Four Things That You Think Might Affect Your Workers’ Compensation Claim- But Don’t!

Four Things That You Think Might Affect Your Workers’ Compensation Claim- But Don’t!

Denver Workers Compensation

If you’ve been injured on the job, and are considering filing for workers’ compensation benefits in Colorado, you may be wondering how to file your claim, and what factors may affect your workers’ compensation case. Many injured workers believe that certain circumstances may affect whether or not their workers’ comp claim will be approved. Here are 4 things that many injured workers believe will affect their claim- but typically will not:

1- Your employer is at fault for the injury.  Workers’ Compensation is a hundred year law that reflects a compromise between injured workers and workers.  Employers must now pay for all injuries that happen on the job – even ones where the employee is negligent, or someone else is negligent, or there is no negligence at all.  In exchange, employers cannot be sued by their employees for work injuries.

2- You can’t go back to the work you used to be able to do.  Unfortunately we see this all too often.  The law in Colorado is incredibly indifferent to employees who cannot go back to doing the kinds of work, or earning the income, they used to do before the injury. There are only two “disability” benefits under Workers Compensation after the Doctor says you are at Maximum Medical Improvement.  The first is called Permanent Partial Disability and the amount is primarily based on loss of range of motion.  It does not go up or down depending upon whether you are still working.

The second is called Permanent Total Disability and it covers wage loss after the injured worker reaches Maximum Medical Improvement.  But it is incredibly difficult to get because the injured workers must be able to prove to a Judge that they are so disabled that that they cannot earn ANY Wages at ANY job in ANY location.  If you can do a temporary, part-time, seasonal job at minimum wage – then you cannot get any compensation for wage loss after MMI under workers compensation.

(You may be eligible for other benefits under other laws, for example unemployment benefits, or social security disability benefits.)

3- You worked many years for the employer.  While it may make you more sympathetic to treating or evaluating doctors, the law does not provide injured workers with more or less benefits simply because they have worked ten years, ten months or even ten hours with the employer before your injury.

4- Your employer closes.  Your employer paid premiums to an insurance company to cover all your benefits for your injury. It does not matter what happens with your employer.

 

Workers’ Compensation in Colorado can be complicated. Let our experienced Denver area workers’ compensation attorneys help you navigate your claim and help get it approved. Call Us Toll Free! (866) 356-9898 or click here for a free consultation!

The Importance of Securing a Comprehensive Workers’ Compensation Settlement

The Importance of Securing a Comprehensive Workers’ Compensation Settlement

Denver Workers Compensation Greeley Workers Compensation Lawyer

If you are eligible for workers’ compensation benefits due to a work injury, the payments and medical care you receive are typically finite. Once your treating physician okays your ability to return to work, your benefits end. This is the situation in temporary disability cases. But what if you suffer a permanent disability?

Maximum Medical Improvement

At some stage during your care, you will reach a point where your recovery is at an endpoint. This means that you are not likely to continue improving, even if you are not back to your pre-injury state. If your injury was severe, it’s possible that you may not be physically able to return to the workforce. When this is the case, you may continue receiving weekly benefits through worker’s compensation or request a lump sum, subject to a 4% per annum reduction. Some permanently injured workers may want to consider a settlement that covers future financial and medical needs.

Normally, in a settlement arrangement, the employer and insurer pay a certain sum of money to the injured worker to settle all past, present and future financial obligations. In return for these settlement funds, the employee gives up any and all future demands and claims against them. Therefore, a workers’ compensation settlement must be very carefully negotiated to ensure that that all your current and future needs will continue to be met.

When you sign a settlement agreement, you give up the following rights under the workers’ compensation benefits system:

Temporary disability benefits
Permanent disability benefits
Permanent total disability benefits
Future medical treatment
Disfigurement compensation
Penalty fees against the insurance company and/or your employer
The right to reopen your case
The right to make any claims for additional benefits for unknown injuries
Your attorney should be able to negotiate these expenses, claims, and potentialities into your settlement agreement, because you only get one shot at this. Barring very minute exceptions, once you sign your settlement agreement, you are stuck with the consequences.

Reopening Your Settlement

In Colorado, when you enter into a settlement agreement, you give up the right to reopen your workers’ compensation case due to a mistake or if your condition worsens. It may be possible to reopen the settlement agreement, but only if you can prove fraud or that a mutual mistake of material fact occurred.

Mutual Mistake of Material Fact

This is a high bar to meet. The mistake must be one made by both sides of the agreement, and it must be an error that has essential bearing on your case. Higher unanticipated bills or additional medical treatment requirements do not constitute a mutual mistake of material fact. Discovering a new medical problem may not qualify either, even if you discover that this previously unknown medical issue was the result of your settled work injury. Fortunately for Victor England, this wasn’t the case.

England v. Amerigas Propane

This case is an example of the stringent requirement for reopening a workers’ compensation settlement agreement. The Colorado Supreme Court decided the case on September 30, 2017. Truck driver England was injured in 2012, and he entered into a settlement agreement governed by the Colorado Worker’s Compensation Act. In 2013, England’s doctor discovered a previously undiagnosed stress fracture to his scapula. The settlement form used included a paragraph prohibiting a reopening of the settlement unless there was fraud or mutual mistake of material fact. England petitioned the ALJ to reopen his settlement and won, but the employer appealed, and the Court of Appeals ruled against the employee. England appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court, which finally agreed that this issue demonstrated a mutual mistake of material fact. His case was reversed and remanded.

Turn to an experienced and knowledgeable Colorado workers’ compensation lawyer to help you determine the best approach when you have been seriously injured at work. If a settlement agreement is your best option, your attorney can skillfully negotiate terms that will ensure your continued care and financial stability in the wake of your injury. Get a free review of your workers’ compensation case with our expert Denver area workers’ compensation attorneys now.

You Won’t Believe the Unusual Injuries Covered by Workers’ Comp

You Won’t Believe the Unusual Injuries Covered by Workers’ Comp

Denver Disability Denver Workers Compensation

Workers Compensation is an important employee benefit and right. It’s designed to pay for treatment associated with injuries and illnesses that occur as you perform duties associated with your job. However, it can cover eight unusual injuries you may have never considered before now.

Company Events

At the company picnic, you trip while playing volleyball and sprain your ankle. Your injuries could be covered by Workers Comp. File a claim if you’re injured or become ill during a company-sponsored picnic or party, business meeting held off-site, corporate ballgame or any special event you attend because of work.

Lunch Breaks

You walk into the lunch room for your break, slip on the wet floor and break your elbow. Your injuries could be covered by Workers Comp. You could also consider filing a claim if you’re injured while picking up lunch at the corner deli for your boss since technically you are working, but your injuries won’t be covered if you are injured while grabbing lunch for yourself or a co-worker.

Travel

You’re rear-ended while driving to work and suffer whiplash. If you’re in your personal car, you can’t file a Workers Comp claim, but if that same accident happens while you drive a company car, you could be eligible for Workers Comp. It can also cover injuries that occur as you travel to business meetings, to meet clients or while visiting potential and current customers.

Diseases and Illnesses

Your company decides to remodel the offices, and you work on the same floor as the repairs. Because of the asbestos in the old ceiling tiles, you develop black lung disease. File a Workers Comp claim for this and other diseases or illnesses that occur because of your work.

Hearing Loss

After working in a noisy environment for a few year, you notice that you can’t hear as well as you used to. File a Worker Comp claim, talk to your Denver disability attorney and receive compensation for your impairment if you can prove that the hearing loss happened while you were on the job.

Mental Health Conditions

Your boss micromanages every project and places so much pressure on you that you can’t even go to work. Consider filing a Workers Comp claim if you become chronically stressed, depressed or traumatized on the job. Be prepared to prove that your condition is caused 100 percent by your work, and ask a medical professional to help you prove your case.

Pre-existing Conditions

The ruptured disc in your back was repaired years ago and hasn’t bothered you until you started performing repetitive lifting tasks for your job. Now, you may be able to file a Workers Comp claim because your job aggravated your preexisting condition.

Misconduct

While showing off your muscles for a cute co-worker, you lift a chair and promptly drop it on your foot. Your injury could be covered by Workers Comp since it can cover injuries even if they occur as you break a company safety rule or perform a criminal act. Before you decide to embrace misconduct, though, remember that it does not usually cover self-inflicted injures and you give up your right to sue your employer if you file a Workers Comp claim.

These eight areas are unusual but could fall under Workers Comp. As with any Workers Compensation claim, you must prove that the illness or injury was caused by your job and is work-related. Contact your Denver workers compensation attorney today to learn more. We’re here to help you figure out if you can file a claim, and we’ll work with you to get you the benefits you deserve.

Workers’ Compensation Fraud: 4 Stories of Those Who Were Caught

Workers’ Compensation Fraud: 4 Stories of Those Who Were Caught

Denver Workers Compensation

Workers’ compensation fraud is a problem, due to propaganda, most think the fraud is perpetuated by the workers; however, employers also commit fraud by intentionally misclassify employees to widespread insurance schemes. These schemes cost the system money and detrimentally impact injured workers who rightfully deserve workers’ comp benefits.

Fortunately, most big money scams are eventually uncovered. Here are some stories of workers’ comp fraud over the years that made headlines when the perpetrators were caught.

Massive Medical Insurance Scam

An alleged California medical insurance scam racked up nearly $100,000 in false workers’ compensation medical claims. The fraudulent money-making scheme involved seven people, and was apparently spearheaded by a chiropractor. Several clinics treated injured workers and submitted inflated bills for exaggerated injuries and more. The businesses brought in more than $12 million in payments with their scam. Penalties for the charges they face can include up to 97 years in prison.  

 

FedEx Delivered Fraud in Multiple States

Well-known package-delivery company FedEx found themselves in hot water last year to the tune of $240 million! This proposed settlement was the result of a common scheme some employers use to avoid paying workers’ compensation and other employee-related costs and benefits. It involved fraudulently classifying employee as independent contractors, and dates back to litigation that began in 2005. The settlement was approved for $227,000 earlier this year. About 12,000 drivers in 19 states will receive payments of various amounts from the total.

 

Fake and Fraudulent Florida Construction Company

 

In this recent case, Leon Jimenez, the owner of a construction company, ran a widescale workers’ compensation scam. The company didn’t even perform any construction work. Instead, Jimenez was selling workers’ compensation certificates to subcontractors for profit. The subcontractors got their bogus certificates and the employees were left exposed to the risk of uncovered work injuries. Jimenez was arrested for workers’ compensation fraud, false documentation, grand theft, and various other charges that may carry up to 30 years in prison.

 

If you’ve been injured on the job and you believe that your employer or his insurer is behaving unfairly or illegally, contact an experienced workers’ compensation attorney like Kaplan Morrell to protect your rights.

SOURCES

 

https://www.thebalance.com/workers-compensation-fraud-examples-4101604

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-fedex-settlement-idUSKCN0Z229Q

http://www.theindianalawyer.com/judge-approves-227m-in-fedex-driver-suit-settlements/PARAMS/article/43610

http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20170602/NEWS08/912313724/Construction-firm-owner-arrested-workers-comp-fraud-Chuy-Construction-Florida

http://www.desertsun.com/story/news/crime_courts/2016/06/06/seven-riverside-county-charged-98m-medical-fraud/85368290/

Marijuana Use Can Impact Your Workers’ Compensation Benefits

Marijuana Use Can Impact Your Workers’ Compensation Benefits

Denver Workers Compensation

When it comes to marijuana use on-the-job, the best advice is “don’t do it!” Contrary to what you may believe, whether for medical or recreational uses, your right to toke is not protected by law in the work environment. Colorado has legalized both the medical and recreational consumption of marijuana, but our state laws still butt up against federal laws. And this makes for lots of confusion across the board.

Employers on Marijuana Use

Legal marijuana, whether for medical reasons or recreational use, is no mandate for use at work. Employers are well within their legal rights to prohibit consumption at work and to require drug testing to weed out users from their workforce.

Federal law prohibits the possession and consumption of marijuana for any reason. This supports the rights of employers in banning marijuana consumption in their employees. Now that the new Trump administration is in place, federal versus state law on marijuana may become even murkier. Currently, there is no clear-cut answer on whether the federal government will be cracking down on states that allow legal marijuana use.

Statewide Marijuana Use Laws

As of the November 2016 election, more than half of all the states in the union, plus D.C., now have medical and/or recreational marijuana use legislation on their books.

1. California passed legal recreational marijuana use last November.
2. Massachusetts joined the ranks of recreational marijuana use states this past election.
3. Maine will soon be allowing limited recreational marijuana use and on-site consumption in social clubs.
4. Though late to the party, Nevada is now a legal recreational marijuana state.
5. Washington, D.C. voted for nonmedical marijuana use in 2014.
6. Oregon came aboard on recreational use of marijuana in the summer of 2015.
7. Alaska passed recreational marijuana law in 2015.
8. Colorado passed legislation to allow recreational marijuana use in 2012. Recent ballot initiatives support public consumption programs in Denver.
9. Washington joined Colorado in groundbreaking recreational marijuana use in 2012.
10. Florida, Arkansas, North Dakota, Montana, Arizona, New Mexico, Minnesota, Michigan, Illinois, Louisiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware have all legalized medical marijuana.

Bottom Line: Colorado Statute on Marijuana and Workers’ Compensation

Regardless of what the future holds for legal marijuana consumption, for now, Colorado Statute, Article 42 of Title 8 limits your financial benefits under the workers’ compensation system if you test positive for a controlled substance. You can lose 50 percent of your income replacement benefits if marijuana use is detected. While you will still receive full medical treatment benefits, your finances will likely suffer greatly from this impact.

Note that the issue with federal vs. state laws on marijuana impact this area of the law as well. §8-42-112.5. C.R.S. excludes medically prescribed drugs from the identified controlled substances, but that’s the problem. Doctors in Colorado cannot prescribe marijuana. They can only advise their patients on its use.

If you have questions about marijuana and the workplace and workers’ compensation benefits, ask a lawyer. Your pot-smoking buddy probably has a lot of opinions and knows quite a bit about the legalities of smoking weed in Colorado. But workers’ compensation is a complicated system wherein state and federal laws often overlap. A Colorado workers’ compensation lawyer is your best source of information on this thorny subject. We’re always here to answer your questions- don’t wait- get a free consultation on your workers’ compensation case now.

 

How Trump May Affect Workers’ Compensation In Colorado

How Trump May Affect Workers’ Compensation In Colorado

Denver Disability Denver Workers Compensation Workers Compensation Blog

The new Trump administration has ushered in some changes that many Americans weren’t quite prepared for, and much of the impact is not yet fully known. After all, he’s only been in office for a little over four months, and many changes are yet to come. With respect to workers’ compensation (work comp) benefits, the potential effect has not been fully realized. However, it appears that the greatest potential impact will come from the repeal of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and budget cuts.

Healthcare Reform

In Colorado and many other states, the ACA, more popularly called Obamacare, has generated a favorable trend in work comp claims. Claim rates and costs have been dropping, and this movement is very likely due to increased worker access to healthcare. In its 2016 report, the Upjohn Institute for Employment Research identified a strong correlation between the decreased work comp claims and costs and the uptick in health insurance coverage.

Joe Paduda of Health Strategy Associates delves even deeper into the link between Obamacare and work comp claims. He alleges that workers who are hurt on the job have less reason to pursue care through their employer’s work comp insurance if they have their own health insurance.

Further, other health issues that may impact their work injury can be covered by the worker’s insurance, rather than work comp. For example, an employee with high blood pressure would need additional treatment for his hypertension before he could undergo a necessary work-related surgical procedure. However, when the worker has health insurance, his coverage would bear the additional cost, rather than work comp.

The proposed repeal and replacement efforts of Trump and the Republican-led House has thrown millions into uncertainty with respect to healthcare coverage. The most recent version of the new TrumpCare coverage, the AHCA, has the potential to take away health insurance from 14 million Americans by next year, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates. And the number of insured is expected to continue increasing over the next 9 years.

These dire projections could spell big trouble for work comp. Uninsured workers would likely once again turn to work comp for as much medical coverage as possible. These changes would also disproportionally affect older employees, workers in higher risk jobs and many who currently receive coverage through Medicaid. These issues will equate to increased claims and higher costs.

Budget Cuts and Safety Issues

Trump has also proposed budget cuts and safety reform rollbacks that will have adverse effects on the work comp system. While the Obama administration was moving towards establishing minimum workers’ compensation benefit standards on the state level, the Trump administration has expressed no interest in pursuing these reforms.

Repeal of an Obama-era OSHA safety regulation could have a detrimental impact on injured workers, as well. The “Volks” rule requires dangerous industry employers to keep health and safety incident records for five-and-a-half years. But Congress changed that to just six months, and Trump signed off. This minimum record-keeping requirement may prevent identification of frequent and repeated safety issues with many companies, and make it much more difficult for their employees to obtain work comp benefits when injured.

If a disabled worker is receiving both Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and work comp benefits, the total may not exceed 80 percent of the average earnings that the worker was receiving before he became disabled. It they do, the SSDI benefits are reduced to offset the overage. In 15 states, this works in the reverse. Instead, it is the work comp benefits that are offset. On May 23, Trump released information on his most recent budget plan with proposed cuts. The Workers’ Compensation Reverse Offset faces elimination in 15 states, of which Colorado is one. With this change, work comp will need to make up the shortfall that the government has been covering via SSDI, hence, raising costs.

Overall, it appears that the Trump administration will be bad news for work comp in Colorado, and throughout the nation. And that’s only addressing what we know so far. If you have questions about these pending changes, or other workers’ compensation issues, please contact us for answers.

 

 

Sources

Kalin: Obamacare has had an impact on workers’ compensation claims in Colorado

AHCA, CBO, and Workers’ Comp

Four Ways the New Administration Will Influence Workers’ Comp

http://www.safetyandhealthmagazine.com/articles/15517-trump-signs-resolution-to-strike-down-volks-recordkeeping-rule

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/05/23/here-list-agencies-and-programs-trump-budget-would-defund-entirely/DMRzbdY4lwB0XEGA13Y6PP/story.html

How Does House Bill 1119 Stack Up For Workers’ Compensation In Colorado?

How Does House Bill 1119 Stack Up For Workers’ Compensation In Colorado?

Denver Workers Compensation Greeley Workers Compensation Lawyer Workers Compensation Blog

The Colorado General Assembly has proposed new legislation that would address the issue of worker injuries when their employers have no workers’ compensation insurance. If passed, the proposed law packaged in House Bill 1119 will create the Colorado Uninsured Employer Act.

Colorado’s HB 1119 Overview

This legislation is a show of bipartisanship with support from Democrat Senator Cheri Jahn and Democrat Representative Tracy Kraft-Tharp and Republican Senator Jack Tate and Republican Representative Lang Sias. The Act would create a fund from which eligible injured workers can draw benefits. Employer penalties and fines imposed by the Division of Workers’ Compensation for no insurance coverage will help fund the account. Other financial sources may include grants, donations, and public and private gifts.

The bill also directs the establishment of a governing board to cover a range of duties for the uninsured employer fund. Some of these responsibilities include the setting of criteria for rates, claims adjustments, rules adoption and benefit payments. The Board must establish a plan of operation for fund administration duties and money collection procedures for the fund.

The Plight of the Injured Worker and No Workers’ Compensation Coverage

As a worker, when you are considering employment, you may look at several different factors. While stable work hours, healthcare benefits, paid leave, and retirement plans are frequently considered, whether your potential employer has workers’ compensation coverage rarely comes up.

Because it’s the law, most workers assume their employer has the necessary coverage. They only discover a lapse if they experience a work injury that leads to a Colorado workers’ comp claim. A seriously injured employee who is unable to receive benefits under workers’ comp due to their employer’s negligent insurance oversight is left in a precarious position.

Workers’ comp covers medical treatment for your injury or illness. It also pays a percentage of your wage loss if you are unable to work due to your injury. With no workers’ comp coverage, these and other benefits are no longer available.

Seriously injured workers find themselves struggling to receive desperately needed medical treatment and facing overwhelming unpaid bills due to their lost wages. In the event of a resulting disability, the injured worker is unable to receive the temporary or long-term disability benefits that would otherwise be available to him under the workers’ comp program.

Related: Passage of Amendment 69 Could be Bad News for Colorado Workers’ Compensation

One option in this situation is to sue your employer in civil court for the losses associated with your injury. A big problem with this method of reimbursement is the length of time it typically takes to recover damages in civil court. The process is lengthy, and your medical and financial needs are immediate. The biggest problem is that most employers don’t have the assets to pay the benefits due injured workers. Bankruptcy is declared – or the business stops functioning – and the injured worker is left with an order he or she cannot collect.

The proposed Colorado Uninsured Employer Act is a far more effective solution to the uninsured employer problem. Many other states already have these funds set up for these types of injured workers. Some have temporary disability insurance programs instead.

Uninsured Employers’ Workers’ Compensation Fund Examples

Several states, such as California, New Jersey, and New York, have some form of compensation funding for injured workers whose employers have no coverage. California has two funds, the Uninsured Employers Benefits Trust Fund (UEBTF) and the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund (SIBTF).

New Jersey also operates two funds, the Uninsured Employer’s Fund and the Second Injury Fund. In New York, their Uninsured Employers Fund (UEF) assigns direct liability to the employer for compensation payments and medical costs.

HB 1119 was introduced on January 20, 2017 and is currently under consideration. Meanwhile, if you have suffered a work injury and subsequently learned that your employer has no workers’ compensation insurance, contact a seasoned Colorado Workers’ Compensation lawyer like Kaplan Morrell to explore your options.

Need help now? We’re here for you. Contact our Denver Workers’ Compensation Attorneys here, and if you’re out in the “burbs” you can reach our Greeley Workers’ Compensation Attorneys here.  We’re here to help- and we will fight to get you the benefits you are entitled to!

 

 

Social Security Recipients Second Amendment Rights preserved Having a Representative Payee No Longer Prevents You From Owning a Firearm

Social Security Recipients Second Amendment Rights preserved Having a Representative Payee No Longer Prevents You From Owning a Firearm

colorado gun laws Denver Disability Denver Workers Compensation gun laws Social Security Blog Workers Compensation Blog

In February 2017, the House of Representatives voted to “overturn an Obama administration rule” that required the Social Security Administration to “forward the names of all Social Security Disability Insurance . . . benefit recipients who use a representative payee . . . to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System . . ..

Reaction sadly was over-the-top and exaggerated as some gun safety advocates characterized the vote as the House permitting “severely mentally ill” people from getting guns and will make Americans less safe.

WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED

The Obama Administration required the Social Security Administration to send the records of Social Security Disability (SSDI) recipients who need a representative payee to the FBI for the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.  This meant these particular SSDI or SSI recipients were deprived of their right to purchase a firearm.

What’s a Representative Payee?

Individuals are required to have a representative payee for mental impairments when a beneficiary is “legally incompetent or mentally incapable of managing benefit payments.”  An injured and disabled worker who has difficulties remembering deadlines, properly doing math, or any other significant inability to spend their SSDI benefit properly may be required to have a representative payee even if his or her disability has nothing to do with a mental impairment.

Having a Representative Payee does not mean that your inability to mange finances is because a disabled worker is violent, or poses a risk to themselves or to others.

Because of the myriad of impairments that could require a representative payee, even the American Civil Liberties Union (“ACLU”) spoke out against the rule, saying “A disability should not constitute grounds for the automatic per se denial of any right or privilege, including gun ownership.”  Republican House Judiciary Chairman, Bob Goodlatte opposed the rule because “it paints all those who suffer from mental disorders with the same broad brush.”

Congress has now revoked that rule.

WHAT HAPPENS NOW?

Because of this vote, if you are awarded Social Security Disability benefits, SSDI or SSI, and have the need for a Representative Payee – the Social Security Administration will no longer automatically report you to the NICS.

Have Questions?

Navigating the Social Security Disability process is not always easy.  Circumstances are always changing, and we are happy to answer questions and help navigate the process.  Email – Tre Eyden, EDPNA, or call 970-356-9898.