Supreme Court Rules Against Social Security Survivors’ Benefits

Aug 22, 2014 | Social Security Disability

Social Security Survivors’ Benefits – Astrue v. Capato:  The Supreme Court unanimously rules against Social Security survivors’ benefits for posthumously conceived twins.

In an uncommon moment of agreement, the US Supreme Court decided 9-0 that twins born via in vitro fertilization using the deceased father’s frozen sperm were not entitled to survivor benefits based on the father’s SSA earnings record.   Karen Capato gave birth to twins conceived with her late husband Robert’s frozen sperm 18 months after he passed away. Mr. Capato was a Florida resident when he died.  See

The Social Security Administration denied the twin’s mother’s claim for survivor benefits since, under Florida’s law, children born after a parent’s death may only inherit property if they were conceived while the parent was living.  According to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Florida law was written “to benefit primarily those supported by the deceased wage earner in his or her lifetime.”

Since the Social Security Administration looks to each state’s inheritance laws, the Justices might have ruled differently if another state’s laws were involved.

Related Article: Social Security Maximization: The Conversation You Shouldn’t Wait For

Social Security’s rules are complex and confusing.  You don’t have to face them alone.

We’re here to help.

Have you or a loved one suffered a workplace injury in Colorado? At Kaplan Morrell, we’re here to support you. Our expert team is just a call or text away at 970-356-9898. You can also easily reach out to a member of our Workers’ Compensation Claim team through our chat feature right here.

Rest assured, every consultation with us is not only free but also held in the strictest confidence. Let Kaplan Morrell guide you toward the peace of mind and benefits you deserve.

 Connect with Kaplan Morrell




En Kaplan Morrell ofrecemos consultas gratuitas y hablamos español.